15 Kommentare

1. 
   kibs · 2013-05-20 16:08

   gorgeous album!!

2. 
   herbert-4 · 2013-05-20 21:55

   Wonderful album!!! I've been thinking... Belair lenses have enough coverage for 9x12cm negative??!!!

3. 
   jean_louis_pujol · 2013-05-21 03:28

   wonderful album. A lot of work! how did you obtain this painting effect?

4. 
   maria_vlachou · 2013-05-21 10:46

   another amazing album!!!

5. 
   jeriane · 2013-05-21 11:26

   Great album

6. 
   bkspicture · 2013-05-21 15:59

   The Belair have a 6x12cm negatives so it should cover a 9x12 or 10x12 (4x5")
   @herbert-4

7. 
   herbert-4 · 2013-05-21 16:23

   I've decided that LSI has to make box cameras fitting Belairgon lenses and Lubitel shutter in camera behind the lens position and resurrect Kodak 125 roll film size (4 1/2" x 5 1/2") and make it sturdy in stamped sheet metal with OD crackle paint (if we could only find a 1920ish Corona box camera as example)...

8. 
   herbert-4 · 2013-05-21 16:50

   Wrong number!! After some thought I think the size was 115 roll film in the Corona Camera, and I can't find a trace of it on the Internet. I think I last saw the camera when I was 8, 1958, the year my Grandma died. Clues: camera had Hecho en Mexico on it and the lens was labeled something like Trilomar F/12.5.

9. 
   moodification · 2013-05-21 18:56

   Great album!

10. 
    bkspicture · 2013-05-21 22:21

    Think one of my Zeiss Ikon cameras used that film.
    It used roll film that was not far from large format but I have never seen that being soled.
    Don't remember the exact neg size, only bought the camera becouse it hade a nice old zeiss lens and I use that on my 4x5".
    Would guess that this type of film would be very expensive and also not so easy to find somthing to develop it in.

    The Belairgon lenses would problaly work very well with a homebuild like this.
    And if im not mistaking that you have scale focus in the lens and not like a normal large format camera where you move the hole lens to focus.

    But why not use large format film holders for a build like that?
    Guess that the film will be cheaper and its also quite easy to develop your self if you used to that.
    Seen some nice home built pinhole cameras that uses filmholders and the build don't seems that hard.

    Love to se resoults when the build is done.

    @herbert-4

11. 
    herbert-4 · 2013-05-22 00:36

    I'm thinking about a wooden box camera, with the Belairgon, need to figure out a behind the lens shutter, and sheet film holder??

12. 
    bkspicture · 2013-05-22 10:31

    I follow a guy on youtube that built a awesome pinhole camera and he go thrue how he done it etc.
    Hers the clip when its done.
    youtu.be/eMjRjksSUZo

    His channel have more about this.
    www.youtube.com/user/PinHolePip/videos?flow=grid&view=0
    @herbert-4

13. 
    herbert-4 · 2013-05-22 15:30

    Thanks very much for ideas!! I was looking at making a box camera with Belairgon lens and a Packard shutter. It would require a 3" #6 Packard shutter, and I can't find one that large used, and a new one of that size is EXPENSIVE!!!! From the few reviews of these, I found, they last, literally, forever, and just become heirlooms, used for generations on huge cameras with barrel lenses. Now, I'm just thinking of a wide pinhole, maybe, but I'll keep looking for a Packard shutter, cheap.

14. 
    bkspicture · 2013-05-23 21:21

    Most thing for large format is often way over priced new.
    But large format is great for homebuilt things and one can have a blast with them.
    Love my 4x5" and just tested this as a pinhole camera.
    A expensive pinhole camera with zoom :)

    Good luck with your build and pleace send me a message if you have some pictures of it when its done.
    Love to se it and the resoults.
    @herbert-4

15. 
    rooftophoto · 2013-08-19 11:50

    Nice album , I need start use my 4x5" www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=467225196689450&set=a.4…